Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 985 F.2d 235 - Nobles v. Brown

Nobles v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

985 F.2d 235 · 1992

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2015

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

140199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Daniels v. Williams · Rochin v. People of California · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al. · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton · Nishiyama v. Dickson County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the conduct of the defendants ... amount[ed] to deliberate indifference which shocks the conscience.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “cloth[ed] ... with the authority of the state.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “who had no official authority of any kind.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.