Harper v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis
985 F.2d 285 · 1993
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2013
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · United States v. Fausto · Block v. Community Nutrition Institute · Salsbury Industries v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[in] this case, we recognize the comprehensive scheme that Congress established in the PRA for addressing review of personnel matters for postal employees, and likewise, find `no statutory entitlement to review' within the PRA.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“comprehensive scheme for dealing with challenges to personnel actions of the Postal Service ... does not include judicial review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.