Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 985 F.2d 312 - Owen v. Wangerin

Owen v. Wangerin’s Empirical Analysis

985 F.2d 312 · 1993

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Ball v. City of Chicago (1993), Knoll v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (1999)

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

150199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Wenzler v. Pitchess · Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co. · 128 Wis. 2d 508 - State Bank of La Crosse v. Elsen · Schiessle v. Stephens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The remedy [Rule 41(b) dismissal] is usually applied when the plaintiff is not ready for trial or fails to appear.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Wisconsin courts consider the relationship of the parties and the degree of trust between them, the sophistication of the parties, and whether there were statements made that influenced the person not to read the agreement”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.