Palmer v. Estelle’s Empirical Analysis
985 F.2d 456 · 1993
Citation profile
35 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Turner v. Marshall (1995), Turner v. Marshall (1997)
35 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Sumner v. Mata · Wainwright v. Goode · United States v. Bishop · Bodine v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“); Palmer v. Estelle, 985 F.2d 456 , 458 (9th Cir.1993) (‘‘[A] trial court may consider, but may not rely solely on, the existence of Blacks on a jury when determining whether a prosecutor has violated Batson.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Collins v. Rice · Senegal v. White“this is a factual finding and is therefore presumed to be correct under section 2254(d).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vasquez v. Myers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.