United States v. Vasquez’s Empirical Analysis
985 F.2d 491 · 1993
Citation profile
61 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Hardwell (1996), United States v. Flores (1995)
61 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Disbarment of Johnson · Gravel v. United States · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States · Angrist v. United States · New Jersey Department of Corrections v. Nash
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court will decline to consider a claim in the absence of the appropriate documents in the record on appeal, since any discussion of such a claim would be speculation.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Specifically, the failure to file a trial transcript precludes review of a conviction for sufficiency of the evidence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n the absence of a transcript or a statement of the parties in lieu of a transcript (Fed.R.App.P. 10(c)), the Court of Appeals will not review an issue, even for plain error.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.