United States v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis
985 F.2d 520 · 1993
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 963
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Brewster v. Derwinski · Jacobs v. Singletary · United States v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]nly knowing use of perjured testimony constitutes a due process violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.