No. 92-1827’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 9 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Nilsa Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial Pr Wireless Corp (2000), United States v. Soto-Beníquez (2003)
4 federal appellate · 9 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · State v. Simpson · Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States · United States v. Payner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b)(2) If a party ... fails to obey an order to provide ... discovery ... the court in which the action is pending may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others the following: (C) An order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“between Rule C(6) and Rule 37, and held that the use of discovery sanctions in forfeiture actions was properly governed by its Rule 37 jurisprudence. Id. at 660. Thus, silence in the Supplemental Rules was taken not as an indication that discovery sanctions had no place in forfeiture, but rather as a sign that the Civil Rules were meant to step in and provide the proper procedure. 11 52 Finally, our interpretation of Supplemental Rule C(6) is buttressed by policy considerations. Civil Rule 12(b) motions are intended to”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a disgruntled litigant 'bears a formidable burden in attempting to convince the court of appeals that the lower court erred.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.