Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 985 F.2d 662 - Benitez v. Wolff

Benitez v. Wolff’s Empirical Analysis

985 F.2d 662 · 1993

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Ying Jing Gan v. City of New York (1993), Wright v. Smith (1994)

7 federal appellate ·

290199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Wolff v. McDonnell · Ratchford v. Gay Lib · Connie Robison v. Susan R. Via and Harold Harrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the right in question was defined with ‘reasonable specificity’; (2) whether the decisional law of the Supreme Court and applicable circuit court support the existence of the right in question; and (3) whether under preexisting law a reasonable defendant official would have understood that his or her acts were unlawful.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “compel `the charging officer to be [sufficiently] specific as to the misconduct with which the inmate is charged' to inform the inmate of what he is accused of doing so that he can prepare a defense to those charges and not be made to explain away vague charges set out in a misbehavior report.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “did not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.