Taylor v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
985 F.2d 844 · 1993
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Francis (1999), United States of America v. Chucks Emuegbunam (2001)
39 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Carnegie v. United States · Scharffe v. Perkins · United States v. Timmreck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Improper vouching occurs when a jury could reasonably believe that a prosecutor was indicating a personal belief in a witness' credibility.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]his court specifically has rejected a per se rule as to conflicts of interest and requires proof of an actual conflict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.