Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 985 F.2d 919 - Travis v. Sullivan

Travis v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

985 F.2d 919 · 1993

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Sarchet v. Chater (1996), Hanauer v. Reich (1996)

17 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

290199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Richardson v. Perales · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Catlin v. United States · Will v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]ollowing a sentence six remand, the Secretary must return to the district court to 'file with the court any such additional or modified findings of fact and decision, and a transcript of the additional record and testimony upon which his action in modifying or affirming was based.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The court may, on motion of the Commissioner of Social Security made for good cause shown before the Commissioner files the Commissioner’s answer, remand the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further action by the Commissioner of Social Security, and it may at any time order additional evidence to be taken before the Commissioner of Social Security, but only upon a showing that there is new evidence which is material and that there is good cause for the failure to incorporate such evidence into the record in a prior proceeding[.] •”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “should the Secretary on remand undertake the inquiry mandated by the District Court and award benefits, there would be grave doubt ... whether he could appeal his own order”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.