Brooks v. Mentor Worldwide’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Kansas District Court)
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 337 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360E (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360K (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Buckman Company V.' Legal Committee · Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc. · Robbins ex rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Human Services
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.