Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 985 FSUPP 1157 - Katz v. Alltel Corp.

Katz v. Alltel Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2013

2 federal appellate ·

30199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeaux · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “irrevocably and unconditionally releases, acquits, and forever, discharges ALLTEL from any and all charges, complaints, claims, liabilities, obligations, promises or any other cause of action of any nature whatsoever, known or unknown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]hile [Mrs. Katz] may not assert equitable estoppel as a separate claim, this does not prohibit her from asserting principles of equitable estoppel as a theory for recovery of benefits in Count I.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Katz, his heirs, representatives, executors, and successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of ALLTEL.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.