Connor B. ex rel. Vigurs v. Patrick’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 622 (§ 422 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 624 (§ 424 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 671 (§ 471 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 672 (§ 472 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 675 (§ 475 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Stanley v. Illinois · County of Sacramento v. Lewis · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al. · Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. Romeo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“neither bolstering the administrative ranks nor obtaining the requisite number of foster homes will resolve the ongoing placement challenges related to ensuring a child's unique fit with a prospective placement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“commit[s] this Court to the near-perpetual oversight of an already-complex child-welfare regime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“commonly involve[ ] areas of core state responsibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.