Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 985 NE2D 1108 - Sargent v. State

Sargent v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522

Relies on Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. · United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate Commonly Known as 916 Douglas Avenue · Boehm v. Town of St. John · Citizens National Bank of Evansville v. Foster · State v. Prater

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the forfeiture proceedings from which Sargent appeals were not part of a bankruptcy proceeding, and expanding the reach of those exemptions to proceedings outside the seope of bankruptey would be contrary to the clear intent of our legislature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.