People v. Griffin’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2020
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Murray · People v. Abbott · Nailor v. People · People v. Drake · People v. Russo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The use of facts and data to which CRE 703 applies is distinct from the use here.... [The testifying expert did not use the peer's conclusions as a basis for her findings and opinions. The conclusions merely boistered her findings and opinions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Golob v. People“[BJecause the inferred hearsay statements by the other expert were merely cumulative of other evidence admitted . we conclude that the error in admitting the inferred hearsay statements was harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Pollard“a statement other than one made by the de-clarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence- to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Caldwell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.