Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 985 P.2d 377 - State v. Clark

State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · Dutton v. Evans · Douglas v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he admission of hearsay statements will not violate the confrontation clause if the hearsay declarant is a witness at trial, is asked about the event and the hearsay statement, and the defendant is provided an opportunity for full cross-examination.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not only sworn in as a witness at trial, asked about the alleged incidents, and provided answers to the questions put to her, but she was actually cross-examined. She was not only available but was probably the best witness for the defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`traditional protections of the oath, cross-examination, and opportunity for the jury to observe the witness'[s] demeanor'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.