Cramer v. Wade’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2022
1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Calder v. Jones · Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. · Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc. · Assoc. of St. Croix Condominium Owners v. St. Croix Hotel Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A court of this state having jurisdiction over the subject matter has jurisdiction over a person served in an action according to the rules of civil procedure [[Image here]] (5) in an action that (A) arises out of a promise, made anywhere to the plaintiff or to some third party for the plaintiff's benefit, by the defendant to perform services in this state or to pay for services to be performed in this state by the plaintiff; (B) arises out of services actually performed for the plaintiff by the defendant in this state, or services actually performed for the defendant by the plaintiff in this state if the performance in this state was authorized or ratified by the defendant; (C) arises out of a promise, made anywhere to the plaintiff or to some third party for the plaintiff’s benefit, by the defendant to deliver or receive in this state or to ship from this state goods, documents of title, or things of value; (D) relates to goods, documents of title, or other things of value shipped from this state by the plaintiff to the defendant on the order or direction of the defendant; or (E) relates to goods, documents of title, or other things of value actually received by the plaintiff in this state from the defendant without regard to where delivery to the carrier occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(a) A court of this state having jurisdiction over the subject matter has jurisdiction over a person served in an action according to the rules of civil procedure [[Image here]] (4) in an action claiming injury to person or property in this state arising out of an act or omission out of this state by the defendant, provided, in addition, that at the time of the injury either (A) solicitation or service activities were carried on in this state by or on behalf of the defendant; or (B) products, materials, or things processed, serviced, or manufactured by the defendant were used or consumed in this state in the ordinary course of trade[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'any case ... in which the exercise of jurisdiction is permissible under the Fourteenth Amendment.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barlow v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.