Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

985 So. 2d 1127

Swain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-06-04

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2013

5 state decisions

Relies on 911 So. 2d 140 - Swain v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-06-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. The defendant previously raised this issue on appeal. See Swain v. State, 911 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (while successive Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motions are permitted even though the claims could have been raised in previously filed Rule 3.800(a) motions, and there is no time limit for seeking such relief, the law of the case doctrine prevents a litigant from relitigating the same issues previously considered and rejected on the merits and reviewed on appeal).

/985/so2d/1127 · .json · Public domain