Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

985 So. 2d 1233

Docket No. 5D07-3092.

LeBlanc v. State

Roger D. LEBLANC, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-07-18

Relies on 609 So. 2d 598 - Massey v. State · 847 So. 2d 1156 - Polite v. State

Decided 2008-07-18

¶1James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey R. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Appellant's first point, the legality of the fines imposed as part of his habitual offender sentence, was not preserved by contemporaneous objection or rule 3.800 motion. Accordingly, we affirm on this point without prejudice for Appellant to file a rule 3.800 motion. Polite v. State, 847 So.2d 1156, 1157 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

¶5We also affirm as to Appellant's second point. See Massey v. State, 609 So.2d 598 (Fla.1992).

¶6AFFIRMED.

¶7PALMER, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

/985/so2d/1233 · .json · Public domain