985 So. 2d 500 - Rose v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Ring v. Arizona · 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · 761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State · 622 So. 2d 982 - Huff v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen reviewing a court's summary denial of an initial rule 3.851 motion, an appellate court must accept the movant's factual allegations as true, and the appellate court will affirm the ruling only if the filings show that the movant has failed to state a facially sufficient claim or the existing record demonstrates that there is no issue of material fact to be determined.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the movant is entitled to no relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tompkins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.