Orange County v. Expedia, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 59 So. 2d 636 - May v. Holley · Key Haven Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Internal Imp. Trust Fund · 361 So. 2d 695 - Gulf Pines Memorial Park, Inc. v. Oaklawn Memorial Park, Inc. · 128 So. 2d 586 - Odham v. Foremost Dairies, Inc. · 396 So. 2d 1120 - DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF STATE v. Markham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here is a bona fide, actual, present practical need for declaration; that the declaration should deal with present, ascertained or ascertainable state of facts or present controversy as to a state of facts; that some immunity, power, privilege or right of complaining party is dependent on fact or law applicable to facts; that there is some person or persons who have, or reasonably may have actual, present, adverse and antagonistic interest in the subject matter, either in fact or law; that the antagonistic and adverse interest are all before the court by proper process or class representation and that the relief sought is not merely giving of legal advice by the courts or the answer to questions propounded from curiosity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ramos v. Cach, LLC
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.