¶1We affirm the trial court order summarily denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence, without prejudice to his right to file a timely and verified motion for post conviction relief challenging the voluntariness of his plea, and/or alleging ineffective assistance of his counsel regarding his waiver of additional credit for time served in the drug farm if imposed and served as part of his sentence after his original conviction. See Hamilton v. State, 898 So.2d 172, 174 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (citing Young v. State, 754 So.2d 128 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)) (Polen, J., concurring).
985 So. 2d 681
McFadden v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 2, 2008
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-07-02
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2008
1 state decisions
Relies on 754 So. 2d 128 - Young v. State · 898 So. 2d 172 - Hamilton v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2008-07-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →