985 So. 2d 86 - Forbes v. Cockerham’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. · 341 So. 2d 332 - Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. · 373 So. 2d 498 - Reck v. Stevens · 623 So. 2d 1257 - Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Category B Reconstruct Base and Surfacing”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Forbes v. Cockerham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.