Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 985 S.W.2d 284 - Shavers v. State

Shavers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Mincey v. Arizona · Almanza v. State · Leday v. State · Colburn v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he misstatement of law in the charge, in effect, tells the jury that the defendant may be eligible for parole at an earlier date because of good conduct time,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Under the law applicable in this case, if the defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, she will not become eligible for parole until the actual time served plus any good conduct time earned equals one-half of the sentence imposed or 30 years, whichever is less. Eligibility for parole does not guarantee that parole will be granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “without consideration of any good conduct time he may earn.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.