Shavers v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Mincey v. Arizona · Almanza v. State · Leday v. State · Colburn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he misstatement of law in the charge, in effect, tells the jury that the defendant may be eligible for parole at an earlier date because of good conduct time,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. State · Hill v. State“Under the law applicable in this case, if the defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, she will not become eligible for parole until the actual time served plus any good conduct time earned equals one-half of the sentence imposed or 30 years, whichever is less. Eligibility for parole does not guarantee that parole will be granted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Newman v. State“without consideration of any good conduct time he may earn.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hill v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.