State v. Lanier’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2017
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sladek · State v. Baker · State v. Hunter · State v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Protracted’ means something short of permanent but more than of short duration.” [State v.] Ross, 939 S.W.2d [15,] 18 [(Mo.App.S.D.1997)]. There is not a minimum degree of trauma which must be inflicted to satisfy the statutory definition of protracted loss or impairment. Id. “Whether an injury constitutes protracted impairment depends on the circumstances of each case.” Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bruce“[Pjhysical injury that creates a substantial risk of death or that causes serious disfigurement or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any part of the body.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Norwood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.