Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 985 S.W.2d 83 - State v. Rodriguez

State v. Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably County of Cameron v. Brown (2002), State Ex Rel. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Gonzalez (2002)

50 state decisions

370199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District)

Relationships

Relies on City of Lancaster v. Chambers · State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Payne · County of Harris v. Eaton · State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Kitchen · State v. Burris Ex Rel. Burris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the failure of a governmental unit initially to place a traffic or road sign, signal, or warning device if the failure is a result of discretionary action of the governmental unit; (2) the absence, condition, or malfunction of a traffic or road sign, signal, or warning device unless the absence, condition, or malfunction is not corrected by the responsible governmental unit within a reasonable time after notice; or (3) the removal or destruction of a traffic or road sign, signal, or warning device by a third person unless the governmental unit fails to correct the removal or destruction within a reasonable time after actual notice.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the failure of a governmental unit to perform an act that the unit is not required by law to perform; or (2) a governmental unit’s decision not to perform an act or on its failure to make a decision on the performance or nonperformance of an act if the law leaves the performance or nonperformance of the act to the discretion of the governmental unit.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[d]esign of any public work, such as a roadway, is a discretionary function involving many policy decisions, and the governmental entity responsible may not be sued for such decisions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.