Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 986 F.2d 1248 - United States v. Wind

United States v. Wind’s Empirical Analysis

986 F.2d 1248 · 1993

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2016

15 federal appellate · 2 district ·

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on United States v. Traxel · United States v. Ellis · United States v. Edwards · Davis v. United States · State v. Moon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that the order of discharge itself did not contain an express limitation on the right to possess firearms is not controlling. This court has held that even if the discharge certificate itself does not include the express limitation required by § 921(a)(20), a prior conviction is used for sentence enhancement if the defendant may not legally possess the firearm in the state that convicted him.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “(1) determine whether the order of discharge itself contains an express limitation on the right to possess firearms, and if it does not; (2) determine whether the defendant is prohibited by state law from possessing firearms.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[S]tate law determines what constitutes a prior state conviction for purposes of federal firearms statutes, including the effect of any state pardon, expungement or restoration of civil rights.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.