Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

986 F.2d 1414

Docket No. 92-7017.

McCray v. Mason

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: February 1, 1993 Decided: February 22, 1993

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-02-22

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jimmy Nixon v. U.S. Parole Commission

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-02-22

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (CA-91-3317-JH)

Milton McCray, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Jennifer Landis, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Milton McCray appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Mason, No. CA-91-3317-JH (D. Md. Sept. 18, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/986/f2d/1414 · .json · Public domain