Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

986 F.2d 1416

Docket No. 92-7000.

United States of America v. Flowers

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: November 30, 1992 Decided: February 22, 1993

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-02-22

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States of America v. Gaffney II H

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-02-22

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CR-89-97-C-P, CA-92-178-3)

Ervin Herman Flowers, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas J. Ashcraft, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Ervin Herman Flowers appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Flowers, Nos. CR-89-97-C-P, CA-92-178-3 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 9, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/986/f2d/1416 · .json · Public domain