Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

986 F.2d 1416

Docket No. 92-7154.

United States of America v. W Steinhorn

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: February 1, 1993 Decided: February 24, 1993

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-02-24

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States of America v. Gaffney II H

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-02-24

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-22-PN, CA-92-1985-H)

Neil W. Steinhorn, Appellant Pro Se.

Gary Patrick Jordan, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Neil W. Steinhorn appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Steinhorn, Nos. CR-90-22-PN, CA-92-1985-H (D. Md. Oct. 30, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/986/f2d/1416 · .json · Public domain