Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 986 F.2d 195 - Hendrix v. Page

Hendrix v. Page’s Empirical Analysis

986 F.2d 195 · 1993

Citation profile

125
cited by 125 later decisions
5
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 125 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Reynolds v. Beneficial National Bank (2002), Fisher v. Apostolou (1998)

47 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions

7201993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · United States v. Swift & Co. · Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail · Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 125 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ny court that issues an injunction can modify it for good cause on the motion of a person adversely affected by it. Transgo, Inc. v. Ajac Transmission Parts Corp., supra, 768 F.2d [1001] at 103 [(9th Cir. 1985)]; Winterland Concessions Co. v. Trela, 735 F.2d 257, 260 (7th Cir.1984).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'(e) Except as [otherwise] provided in ... this section, discharge of a debt of the debtor does not affect the liability of any other entity on, or the property of any other entity for, such debt.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “adopted in Rufo, --- U.S. at ----, 112 S.Ct. at 765 , is no less suitable to other types of equitable case. Rufo assimilates the standard for modification to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(5), which, so far as pertinent to this case, authorizes relief from a judgment whenever”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.