Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 986 F.2d 281 - United States v. Starr

United States v. Starr’s Empirical Analysis

986 F.2d 281 · 1993

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
April 2000
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wise · United States v. Dinges · United States v. Lublin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This case involves more than simply writing a check on a closed account. [The defendant] opened the account at Mercantile Bank using an alias, then closed it six months later. The following month [the defendant] opened an account at Community Bank using a different alias, and later directed an acquaintance to deposit the check drawn of the closed Mercantile account into the Community account. Community Bank honored the bad check and suffered a loss.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.