United States v. Ramilo’s Empirical Analysis
986 F.2d 333 · 1993
Citation profile
81 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 125 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2010 · most notably Dolan v. United States (2010), Dolan v. United States (2010)
81 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Relies on United States v. Bruchey · United States v. Smith · United States v. Rogat · United States v. Cannizzaro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 125 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at the time restitution is ordered the record must reflect some evidence the defendant may be able to pay restitution in the amount ordered in the future.”
23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“consider ... the financial resources of the defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and the defendant's dependents, and such other factors as the court deems appropriate.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“although future restitution may be ordered despite a defendant's present indigency, the order must be based on some evidence the defendant may be able to pay the amount fixed when required to do so.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.