United States v. James’s Empirical Analysis
986 F.2d 441 · 1993
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2016
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 14 U.S.C. § 88 · 14 U.S.C. § 89 · 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 912 · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Foy v. Northeast Suburban Life · Tiller v. NCNB Bank · United States v. Monsanto · Shibuya v. Voss · Duckworth v. Eagan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.