Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 986 F.2d 7 - Hall v. L

Hall v. L’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
July 2012
most recently cited

7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2012

7 district ·

40199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Teague v. Lane · Murray v. Carrier · Engle v. Isaac · Harris v. Reed · California v. ARC America Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so that the state had the first chance to correct the claimed constitutional error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.