Park v. Park’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2024
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 221 Ill. App. 3d 410 - In Re Marriage of Diehl · Borchgrevink v. Borchgrevink · Julsen v. Julsen · Siekawitch v. Siekawitch · Bird v. Starkey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the child's preference if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form a preference.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. West v. West · Smith v. Weekley“While a court determining custody [between biological parents] must always consider each of these [AS 25.24.150(c)] factors, it need not refer to all of them in explaining its custody decision.”); Duffus v. Duffus, 932 P.2d 111 , 779 (Alaska 1997) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dara v. Gish · Puddicombe v. Dreka“'The court [when considering the best interest factors of AS 25.24.150(c)] needs only to discuss those factors that it considers actually relevant in light of the evidence presented in the case before it; express mention of each factor is not required, but the court's findings must at a minimum 'give us a clear indication of the factors which [it] considered important in exercising its discretion or allow us to glean from the record what considerations were involved.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Collier v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.