Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 986 P.2d 865 - Peter v. Progressive Corp.

Peter v. Progressive Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boddie v. Connecticut · Guin v. Ha · Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co. · State, Department of Highways v. Green · French v. Jadon, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The presiding judge of the superior court for each judicial district with the approval of the chief justice of the Supreme Court may appoint one or more standing masters for such district, and the court in which any action is pending may appoint a special master therein. As used in these rules the word "master" includes a referee, an auditor and an examiner, and a magistrate or a deputy magistrate. The compensation, if any, to be allowed to a master shall be fixed by the court, and shall be charged upon such of the parties or paid out of any fund or subject matter of the action which is in the custody and control of the court, as the court may direct. The master shall not retain the master's report as security for compensation; but when the party ordered to pay the compensation allowed by the court does not pay it after notice and within the time prescribed by the court, the master is entitled to a writ of execution against the delinquent party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “appointment of a discovery master should generally be reserved for cases (1) where the issues are unusually complex or specialized; (2) where discovery is particularly document intensive; (3) where resolving discovery disputes will be especially time consuming; (4) where the parties are particularly contentious or obstructionist; or (5) where a master will facilitate a more speedy and economical determination of the case.[ 23 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “left with a definite and firm conviction, after reviewing the whole record, that the trial court erred in its ruling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.