Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 986 P2D 881 - Crane v. Crane

Crane v. Crane’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2024

17 state decisions

801999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New York · Lone Wolf v. Lone Wolf · Davis v. Dykman · McGee v. McGee · McClain v. McClain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In making any custody determination-whether following a contested trial or upon the parties' agreement-the superior court must base its decision on the best interests of the child.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'When a stipulation is admitted by both parties or their attorneys in open court and there is no dispute as to the material terms of the settlement, the stipulation is enforceable between the parties absent fraud, duress, or concealment of other facts showing the agreement was not made voluntarily and with full understanding. However, when the subject matter of the agreement is child custody, the agreement must also meet the best interests of the children.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The next factor is evidence of domestic violence, child abuse or child neglect, and a history of domestic violence between the parents, and this factor weighs in favor of Ms. Williams and against Mr. Barbee, principally because of this conviction. Now, I know that you've argued that there have been other instances. [[Image here]] I also know that there have been other domestic violence petitions filed and denied ... I don't blame people for filing things if they feel that they really have been the victim of domestic violence, but on the other hand it's not been proven. So what we've got is we've got this one really big deal incident here where you choked her terribly, and that factor weighs against you.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.