State v. Riviere’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 441 So. 2d 732 - State v. Lynch · Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. · 756 So. 2d 533 - State v. Armstrong · 757 So. 2d 879 - State v. Spain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unauthorized entry of an inhabited dwelling requires general intent. General criminal intent is present when the circumstances indicate that the offender 'in the ordinary course of human experience must have adverted to the prescribed criminal consequences as reasonably certain to result from his act.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Unauthorized entry of an inhabited dwelling is the intentional entry by a person without authorization into any inhabited dwelling or other structure belonging to another and used in whole or in part as a home or place of abode by a person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is not necessary that a person be present in the dwelling at the time of the unauthorized entry to satisfy the inhabitation requirement; however, it must be proven that someone was actually 'living' in the dwelling at the time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.