Stufflebean v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2003
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · In re Disbarment of Pincham · Arens v. United States · State v. Roll · State v. Tolliver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A better practice, to avoid such claims in cases where a defendant pleads guilty to a charge and the prosecuting attorney makes a non-binding recommendation of sentence, is for the trial court, before accepting the defendant’s guilty plea, to specifically advise the defendant on the record that should the court decline to follow the prosecutor’s recommendation, the defendant will not be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.