Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 986 SW2D 39 - In re J.A.H.

In re J.A.H.’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2002
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · High v. State · In re D.A.S. · Johnson v. State · Wilson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “brief containing a `professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re ELY

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.