Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 986 S.W.2d 462 - State v. Storey

State v. Storey’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Griffin v. California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Estelle v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he Fifth Amendment requires that a criminal trial judge must give a ‘no-adverse-inference’ jury instruction when requested by a defendant to do so.” Carter, 450 U.S. at 300 , 101 S.Ct. 1112 . There is “no basis to distinguish between the guilt and penalty phases of [a] capital murder trial so far as the protection of the Fifth Amendment privilege is concerned.” Estelle ... Therefore, when a defendant does not testify in the penalty phase of a capital murder trial, the court must give a “no-adverse-inference” instruction if the defendant so requests.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Under the law, a defendant has the right not to testify. No presumption [of guilt] may be raised and no inference of any kind may be drawn from the fact that the defendant did not testify.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.