Harrell v. Harrell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Because section 201.015(f) is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to a de novo hearing, the referring court is not statutorily precluded from conducting the de novo hearing outside the thirty day window. In this case, the trial court indicated its willingness and intention to hear the matter de novo outside of this window when it set the issue for trial on August 27, more than thirty days after the notice of appeal. [4] While Appellant certainly had the ability to pursue mandamus relief with regard to the trial court's failure to set the matter within thirty days, she was also entitled to acquiesce in a later trial setting.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re Lr · In re L.R.

2. “shall hold a de novo hearing not later than the 30th day after the date on which the initial request for a de novo hearing was filed.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re Lr · In Re AJF