Shaumyan v. O'Neill’s Empirical Analysis
987 F.2d 122 · 1993
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2018
5 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Fuentes v. Shevin · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View · Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court's belief that the Statute is constitutional as applied in Shaumyan I is limited exclusively to the facts of this case and its application to a breach of contract action involving an attachment of real property. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“concern ordinarily uncomplicated matters that lend themselves to documentary proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“lending themselves to accurate ex parte assessments of the merits,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.