United States v. Dack’s Empirical Analysis
987 F.2d 1282 · 1993
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
October 2007
most recently cited
18 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Cheek v. United States · Doerr v. Doerr · Russell v. United States · Martin v. Delaware
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“mandated only if the jury's comprehension of the issues is so misguided that it prejudiced the complaining party.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is limited to the determination of whether the jury was misled in any way and whether it had understanding of the issues and its duty to determine these issues.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e must construe the instructions in their entirety, not in isolation, and look for overall fairness and accuracy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.