Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 987 F.2d 552 - Livadas v. Aubry

Livadas v. Aubry’s Empirical Analysis

987 F.2d 552 · 1991

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
January 2017
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California · Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck · Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc. · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the same position as every other employee in the state when it comes to seeking the Commissioner's enforcement. Every employee . . . is subject to an eligibility determination, and every employee . . . is subject to the risk that the Commissioner will get it wrong.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Congress would not want state officials erring on the side of adjudicating state law disputes whenever it is a close call as to whether a claim is preempted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If an employer discharges an employee, the wages earned and unpaid at the time of discharge are due and payable immediately.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.