Toulson v. Beyer’s Empirical Analysis
987 F.2d 984 · 1993
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 9 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably Coady v. Vaughn (2001), Lambert v. Blackwell (1997)
22 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Teague v. Lane · Rose v. Lundy · Picard v. Connor · Herrera v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““shall not be granted” to a petitioner in custody pursuant to a state court judgment unless the petitioner “has exhausted the remedies available in the courts of the State.” 28 U.S.C.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“affording the state courts a meaningful opportunity to consider allegations of legal error without interference from the federal judiciary.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[allthough the unexhausted claims may not have been presented to the highest state court, exhaustion is not possible because the state court would find the claims procedurally defaulted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.