987 F. Supp. 151 - Spence v. Superintendent’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3661 (Drug and Alcohol Dependent Offenders Treatment Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Ornelas v. United States · Teague v. Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f you get rearrested, that's a voluntary choice you made by going out and doing something which you should not have been doing. It rests solely with you. If you get rearrested ... I'm going to sentence you up to the maximum time allowed by law--again, its eight and a third to 25.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for due process to be served, the breach of a no-arrest condition must be supported by a judicial finding by at least a preponderance of the evidence that [the] defendant committed the crime for which he was arrested”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stevens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.