State Ex Rel. Sk’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2019
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State in Interest of NR · Kehl v. Schwendiman · State in Interest of Jlw · Strollo v. Strollo · State, Division of Child & Family Services v. J.N.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the case `presents an issue of public import that is likely to recur and is capable of evading judicial review.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State Ex Rel. Sl“because we dismiss this appeal as moot, we do not reach the issue of whether we also lack jurisdiction”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Towner v. Ridgway“finds that returning the child to the parent poses a substantial risk to the child's well-being.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.