Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 987 P.2d 63 - State v. TK

State v. TK’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Varga (2004), State v. Smith (2009)

51 state decisions

400200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Republic National Bank of Miami v. United States · Calvin R. Morgan v. Riverside Mills Company, C. A. Folk, T. I. Ward · Kansas v. Colorado · Pearsall v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any case in which an information has been filed pursuant to RCW 13.40.100 or a complaint has been filed with the prosecutor and referred for diversion pursuant to RCW 13.40.070, the person the subject of the information or complaint may file a motion with the court to have the court vacate its order and findings, if any, and, subject to subsection (23) of this section, order the sealing of the official juvenile court file, the social file, and records of the court and of any other agency in the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[a] statute operates prospectively when the precipitating event for operation of the statute occurs after enactment, even when the precipitating event originated in a situation existing prior to the enactment [of the statute].'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A statute does not operate `retrospectively' merely because it ... upsets expectations based in prior law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.